Wednesday, February 27, 2013

How Expressing Faith in Students Can Help Them Be More Open to Learning

     You may or may not realize that in order to be a successful learner, it's necessary to be vulnerable. Vulnerability within an academic context occurs when a student sees through his doubts and fears related to learning or school-related activities and opens himself up to learning or better understanding others or himself. Within the academic realm, a student's ability to make himself vulnerable directly correlates with his degree of self-confidence and some elements of his psychological state. While it is important that students allow themselves to become vulnerable in the pursuit of knowledge to ensure openness and greater absorption or internalization of information, it's equally noteworthy that teachers should be cognizant of students' self-imposed vulnerability, in fact encouraging it when possible. One method through which this can be accomplished is through teachers having faith in students, and continually reinforcing this faith in multiple ways.

      Though teachers can express faith in students, the degree to which this can improve a classroom environment, inspiring more openness, productivity, and critical thinking, has not been experimentally proven. This faith strategy also does not entail the expectation that all students, even students with weak, struggling self-confidence levels, will respond positively.
Some individuals believe that faith in students
involves allowing students greater freedom
but ensuring consistent feedback

      Nonetheless, many individuals do believe that demonstrating faith in students can be a method through which teachers can encourage students to make themselves more vulnerable, thus creating an atmosphere of openness and positivity that can be conducive to more yielding, critical discussions. A teacher at the Hult International Business School, for example, discusses in a recent article how teachers can allow themselves to believe in their students and how this can benefit the students. His tactic for asserting confidence in students is allowing them more space, independence, and freedom, which he believes will eventually inspire most students to be more creative and productive than they would have been in a normally structured learning environment.

      His approach also calls for honest, consistent teacher feedback related to how the students made use of the freedom they were given and the ideas they generated while working. This approach at first seems unreliable, as it anticipates that students will learn what they need to from decreased teacher intervention. Decreased direct intervention could prevent teachers from pinpointing and tackling the issues of struggling students, for example, instead placing most of that responsibility on the struggling students themselves. This general increased insistence on responsibility could facilitate increased maturity among more confident, independent students, but could also be a pitfall for students without the understanding or ability to speak up for themselves.

      In a related article written by public school teacher Julia G. Thompson, she expresses her belief that teachers can inspire faith in students through working within a more traditionally structured academic setting rather than simply allowing for greater freedom and independence in the classroom. Throughout her article entitled "28 Ways to Build Persistent & Confident Students", she outlines many specific strategies for inspiring self-confidence, a handful of which are directly related to teachers' expression of faith. These strategies include teaching students perfect work isn't the only acceptable work, frequently praising students, encouraging students to work independently for as long as possible, and helping students focus on their strengths. These manifestations of faith in students can allow students to become more confident in their own abilities to think independently, can be conducive to a more positive, productive learning environment, and can assist students in overcoming or managing fears or doubts generated by perfectionist tendencies. These tips, however, are probably more useful for younger children than high school juniors, for example, but adaptations of these strategies certainly have the potential to yield positive results.

     In review, many individuals believe that teachers' expressed faith in students has the ability to encourage students to be more vulnerable, open-minded, confident, independent and responsible, though these effects still rest unproven. Some of those who believe teachers should assume a role in which they express their confidence in students believe that teachers should primarily allow students more freedom and independence to accomplish that, while others believe that faith in students can be more strategically manifested within a structured academic environment. As a student I am inexperienced in the teaching field, however, I stress that this post is solely an objective look at educational matters.

If you were/are a teacher, would you/do you put a lot of emphasis on showing students you're confident and faithful in their abilities, or would you be/are you more withholding of your expression of faith in students?

1 comment:

  1. You have to watch this ted talk, really speaks to exactly what you've mentioned about vulnerability: http://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_on_vulnerability.html.

    As for teachers expressing faith in classrooms, I agree and disagree. I agree on the level that open dialogue between teachers and students is necessary to create a good educational environment. I've definitely felt that way in my Math class this year, where we frequently have personal and classroom and teacher evaluation discussions in class. And the open, exposed atmosphere facilitates a lot of creative ways of solving problems and ways of thinking certain proofs to come about. However, perhaps couldn't too much expression of faith in the students be seen as coddling? I think the two aren't the same, but there is a fine line that separates the two. I think while praising students and developing a sense of vulnerability is important for everyone, coddling could leave students to be too complacent, naive, and hurt when they realize the truth.

    I'm not too sure how teachers would go about separating the two, and I don't want to come off as a cynic, but I think the possible repercussions are important to consider.

    ReplyDelete